NewTek LightWave V11 Final x86 & x64

Posted by Users on 2012/02/25

Posted in: 3D, CG Releases, Downloads, Softwares, Windows.

NewTek LightWave V11 Final x86 & x64

Newtek has announced LightWave 11, a powerful new version of its professional 3D Modeling, Animation, and Rendering Software.

LightWave 11 fits into any studio pipeline seamlessly, offering support for Autodesk Geometry Cache and FBX, including pixel-perfect camera matching with Autodesk Maya cameras. It also supports the Unity Game Engine and Pixologic GoZ ZBrush Workflow, making it ideal for all production environments, including smaller specialized studios and individual artists.

Home Site Link :– http://www.newtek.com/

Mirror :-

http://turbobit.net/download/folder/1168345

Mirror :-

http://freakshare.com/folder/160821/b6df402.html

34 comments on “NewTek LightWave V11 Final x86 & x64”

soyabean on 2012/02/25 at 5:22 PM said:

does it look like v10!? if so I’ll take blender all day thanks!
- benton on 2012/02/25 at 10:44 PM said:
  
  it looks like 7
Cauliflower on 2012/02/25 at 8:36 PM said:

^ Yes it has some additions but it’s workflow is still awkwardly outdated. You should stay with Blender which seems to be developing pretty fast.
- soyabean on 2012/02/26 at 11:29 AM said:
  
  I use Maya and Softimage but my third choice would be Blender…no joke ! How people have stuck with LW is beyond me when you consider how LW users have been treated, broken promise after broken promise…great render engine alone doesn’t balance it for me !
  - Cauliflower on 2012/02/26 at 9:55 PM said:
    
    Going from Maya and Softimage to Lightwave for a week showed be what a hell it is to work with Lightwave. Never Again.
  - M1 on 2012/02/27 at 4:49 AM said:
    
    Innumerable 3d effects awards disagree with you.
meIam on 2012/02/25 at 9:12 PM said:

it comes with GoZ now doesnt it?
- InSaN on 2012/02/25 at 10:34 PM said:
  
  Yes it does. And blender’s renderer is still no competition to Lightwave’s.
  - tygryss on 2012/02/26 at 6:16 AM said:
    
    yes, blender can use vray… :D
    I prefer maya, Lightwave just for modelling
Sonic on 2012/02/26 at 2:51 AM said:

Mac Version ???
Thanks
hugh mann on 2012/02/26 at 6:41 AM said:

Lightwave modeller = a polished turd. Here’s an idea newtek Just sell lightwave layout for half the price and make a a goZ like plugin for the likes of modo, blender, etc.
- M1 on 2012/02/27 at 4:55 AM said:
  
  I take it you don’t use Lightwave that much. I use several tools, all of which have their strengths and drawbacks. Maya,etc.. are definitely among them.
3DM on 2012/02/27 at 1:44 PM said:

People still use this outdated software? :D
Joe on 2012/02/27 at 6:18 PM said:

People are ignorant.
LW is being used in many productions as a part of the pipeline
and by tons of smaller studios or freelancers as their entire
pipeline.
Of course if a need a tool i will use what is best for the project
For fast and dirty jobs with tight deadlines not many apps
can beat LW and a good LW generalist.

ps.At the studio (with 12 other artists) we use LW,Maya,C4D,Modo,Houdini
believe me … it is a life saver…
Fprime,VPR,Endomorphs,NO weighting for rigs…

of course for motion graphic hype shit we use C4d,and Houdini for more complex character setups Maya…
in the end MDD export and LW…
- Yogurth on 2012/02/27 at 9:07 PM said:
  
  Of Course it is used widely. Version 10 was the best selling Lightwave release ever and v11 will probably break that record.
- 3DM on 2012/02/28 at 7:21 AM said:
  
  Its still an old crap. LOL
  
  Just kidding… :P
WW on 2012/02/28 at 2:44 AM said:

I feel like an alien here, no one mentioned 3ds max…
Waverproblem on 2012/02/28 at 5:31 AM said:

If you don’t like the wares then why bother to snide up the post or are u flame boys working for AutoNAziDesk?
Thank you for 11 & up your VPR’s!
benton on 2012/02/28 at 12:41 PM said:

lamers often say that everything is a shit
- szamosy on 2012/03/04 at 6:15 AM said:
  
  like, M1…
  ;)
Crackhead on 2012/02/29 at 10:57 AM said:

No offence mate, but 3dsmax is shit too. Maya is ok, but the real deal is Softimage.
- soyabean on 2012/03/06 at 5:45 PM said:
  
  spot on crackhead, Softimage is the standard bearer,not sure the rest would agree but having been in the 3D for over 18 years, tried um all to a general standard and Softimage never let’s me down. Btw by about version 701 or 702 lol, Modo will be up there if Brad and co can employ more testers and keep improving/adding to a steadily growing monster !
  - Mehran Naghizadeh on 2012/03/27 at 9:25 PM said:
    
    I was doing an architectural previsulaization in softimage for 2 weeks, finally I deleted the whole project and did it again in 4 hours, just because of the difference in rendering times. Softimage’s renderer is a true time killer monster, ofcourse better than maya, it’s real-time preview (which was the oldest one in the industry, I believe), is very very slow compared to modo’s (or even fprime) and doing test renders repeatedly is just the worst thing in all 3D packages other than modo (or lightwave + fprime). Even new features for viewport rendering in Maya and 3dsmax are not comparable to modo’s old features.
hagocosas on 2012/02/29 at 1:35 PM said:

you can do awesome thing with any software if you know actually what you are doing. the best software will be the one that you study
hagocosas on 2012/02/29 at 2:29 PM said:

“actually know what you are doing”
MIDAS on 2012/02/29 at 9:01 PM said:

Modo is the shit for modeling. NOTHING beats it. Moddler sucks. I was into Lightwave alot, but that was before i found out that if i wanted to get a job, it was all about Max, or Maya.
- Mehran Naghizadeh on 2012/03/27 at 9:04 PM said:
  
  My Friend! Modo is more than just a great modelling tool. After 10 years of using LW, when modo was just in version 201, I turned to it and now I’m totally devoted to it. I have worked with Maya (since version 2), 3dsmax (since version 3), Softimage|XSI (since version 5), and I defenitely prefer modo. In our studio, modelling, texturing and rendering has been done in modo, and only animation has been left for motionbilder and maya, but with the release 601 of modo, things may dramatically change. Maya does a definitely bad job of animation caching and we have the trouble of bridging between maya and modo (through .mdd files) by the means of softimage and heavy scriting inside both maya (MEL) and modo(Python)
  PS: what makes me eager to still follow LW, is its simpler compatibility with modo and my memories from old days…
samurai popo on 2012/02/29 at 9:19 PM said:

just in case guys. Modo 601 is out
Sp?g on 2012/03/02 at 2:04 AM said:

Remember, LW saved Iron Sky from problems caused by Maya scenes.
Mordor on 2012/03/02 at 4:03 AM said:

Just a sec – some guys here really think they can compare shitty Blender renderer with Lightware renderer? this is a joke, isn’t it? ha ha
szamosy on 2012/03/02 at 8:45 AM said:

sorry boys and girls, thought that i give my old ‘flame’ another try – but sadly it is unistalled pretty much within the first hour, shame – but i think it is a bit too late and far too little… so now we (lightwave) try and do what cinema 4d and the rest have already mastered and with ease!… so for me it is – good by my love and hope we will meet again some day – to reminisce about the good old days!…
Mehran Naghizadeh on 2012/03/27 at 9:21 PM said:

Does anyone know what happened to Lightwave Core?
- Relok on 2012/07/26 at 2:17 AM said:
  
  Sorry no, it without any doubt would have been a major breakthrough and a real upgrade of Lightwave. Modeler and Layout finally together(or not if that’s your preference), modular Tools with great potential towards external renderers and any kind of dynamic tool or animation solvers or plugin to import/export data via tcp too. Dynamic non destructible history. And with all the current cool features of LW like Nodes Engine,VPR, Virtual Camera and great modeling tools and plugins it would have been a great change to invert the latest tendencie for many to leave the package.
Willie on 2012/10/15 at 6:16 AM said:

Woω! This blоg lоoks јuѕt like my οld one!
It’s on a entirely different topic but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Wonderful choice of colors!

Comments are closed.

Search

Search for:
Categories
- Downloads (26,337)
  - CG Releases (24,170)
    - 2D (16,270)
      - Textures (570)
    - 3D (4,643)
      - 3D Models (1,549)
    - Softwares (9,391)
      - Linux (620)
      - Mac (1,931)
      - Plugins (3,780)
      - Windows (7,810)
  - Collection (533)
  - Learning (14,577)
    - Ebooks (277)
    - Tutorials (14,300)
      - Videos (12,246)
  - Miscellaneous (224)
  - Torrent (1,013)
Recent Posts
February 2012

M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29

« Jan Mar »
Tag Cloud
3d modeling 3DMotive 3ds Max Adobe Adobe After Effects Adobe Photoshop Adobe Premiere Pro After Effects Animation Arnold Artstation Autodesk Blender Cinema 4D Digital-Tutors digital editing digital painting Digital Sculpting eLearning Evermotion Game Development Graphic Arts Gumroad Houdini Illustrator Lightroom lynda Maya Mirrors Modeling Nuke Photoshop Plugins Pluralsight Skillshare Substance Painter Training Udemy Unity Unreal Engine Unreal Engine 4 Video editing Video Learning Vray Zbrush
- Warning: Be sure to scan all the downloaded files with your Antivirus and if there is an executable or installer file, make sure to have your antivirus active and open in the background while installing or running the app. Some of the materials posted here are downloaded from CGPeers, So they could potentially have something injected in them.
- We always ask bloggers to scan all the files before publishing the posts, but sometimes it's hard to detect all these things, so if you found anything suspicious (Not false positive, Generic, Patcher, Riskware and Heuristic results, most patches could get false flags like that by some Antivirus companies.) be sure to post comments with the file name and a VirusTotal report result link or the file MD5 Hash (higher than 30% overall positive result). Thank you.

CG Persia