Photo-realistic Male Model + 2 Hour Video Tutorial | Size: 1.4 Gb
Manufacturer: Ten 24 | Language: English | Author: James Busby
Video codec: QuickTime Video: AVC1 (GVC), 1680 x 1022 at 15.000 fps Audio: AAC, 32 KHz, 1 channels, 512 Kbps Duration: 2 hours
Description: Tutorial Chapters:
Chapter 1: Texture Projection (Effective techniques for projection photographic textures on the body mesh)
Chapter 2: Projecting the Head Textures (Using high resolution texture reference to project and bake the head)
Chapter 3: Combining Baked Maps (How to combine a series of Baked out Photographic textures using lighting masks)
Chapter 4: Zbrush texturing (Using Zbrush to clean up textures and remove seams and unwanted distortion)
Chapter 5: Hair (Creating a realistic hair texture)
Chapter 6: Bump maps (Techniques used to extract high resolution distortion free bump maps from colour maps using photoshop)
Chapter 7: Subdermal and Epidermal (Way to extract both sub-dermal and epidermal texture maps for use in the skin shader)
Chapter 8: Skin shading and lighting setup (Setting up the simple skin shader in Lightwave using the maps generated in the previous chapters)
Chapter 9: Specular and gloss maps (Creating specular reflection and gloss maps in Photoshop)
Chapter 10: Render and Post processing (Setting up and rendering the final image and post processing in Photoshop)
Included files:
– 2 Hour video tutorial in QuickTime format split into 10 chapters
– Character model Ztool
– Lightwave scene and model files
– Full resolution 4098 x 4098 textures
– OBJ objects
Do you even know ANYTHING about Lightwave? I have used it since Toaster (beta) days. I am ALSO using Maya XSI and Houdini for the past 7 years or so.
Each one of those apps have their strong points. ONLY a “fool” would bad-mouth an app to hide their ignorance of that product. An “intelligent” person would use various tools to achieve what they are after. You chose which of those camps that you want to be in.
Bottom line; If it is good for James Cameron to use on his Academy Award winning movies, It IS good for me!
Nuff said!
who uses lightwave these days?
I do, and any one out of the me-too bandwagon at least respects its power. Go try rendering such high-quality images out of your bloated and molasses-slow Mental Ray and IF you succeed come back here with your lame trash talk about what you don’t understand, Autodesk fanboy.
oh no….
it’s laightwave!
why you don’t say what program this tutorial is for huh?
haha i thought the same thing! i dont like lightwave
i think people must be more professional maya 3dsMax lightwave softimage C4d Houdini…. are tools to help you saving you ass when you are in production i am working right now on huge arch viz project(lots buildings trees etc…) on maya (im working on maya since maya 5 ), need to be rendered in full HD and impossible to render in mental ray cos of memory error i transfered the project on lightwave on the same machine and it rendred the same scene on full HD radiosity etc… in only 2 mn.
i am not saying that a software is better than others but every artist or studio uses the tool that fit their needs. you dont have to by a boeing 747 to carry 10 people… so
Torrent please!
Thanks for the up anyways ;-)
gee, thanks!
Please people don’t thing about lightwave as a not professional or high level software. Before to give a judgement about something is not known better to be informed.
LW was used in Cinema production since a lot and more than 3dsmax in the past years and today too. About modeling is and ever been impressive with its metanurbs and polymodeling tools. and about rendering quality is one of the better and in it grown plugins that are used now and olny now in other great softwares u mentioned (XSI,3dsmax, MAya etc) for example the fur plugins many of those kind grown to beat the sasquatch plug by worley (http://www.worley.com/) that was the top in absolute
to do a pratic example even this spot was done in Lightwave:
http://www.cg-blog.com/index.php/2007/07/09/citroen-c4-runner-the-embassy.htm
sorry my bad english
all people who thinks one software is better than the other are just a bunch of ****. first and foremost no matter what the video is designed for, the basic principles behind it are the same, they may change the names of the tools but they are always the same in its foundation. if someone can’t get past the barrier of ‘tools’, only means they don’t know the ‘idea’. pff
What about someone give away only the textures
anybody pls give me new link this tutorial
For those who regret on LightWave or Maya or Max or C4D, or whatever, let me tell you the software doesn?t make the good CG Art, is the artist who knows how to use the goods of the software who makes the CG Art…. First Learn this and then you can go on on your CGI Carrer
Warning: Be sure to scan all the downloaded files with your Antivirus and if there is an executable or installer file, make sure to have your antivirus active and open in the background while installing or running the app. Some of the materials posted here are downloaded from CGPeers, So they could potentially have something injected in them.
We always ask bloggers to scan all the files before publishing the posts, but sometimes it's hard to detect all these things, so if you found anything suspicious (Not false positive, Generic, Patcher, Riskware and Heuristic results, most patches could get false flags like that by some Antivirus companies.) be sure to post comments with the file name and a VirusTotal report result link or the file MD5 Hash (higher than 30% overall positive result). Thank you.
fileserve or rapidshare would be awsome
Fileserve Mirror:
http://www.fileserve.com/file/VSCsX2p
http://www.fileserve.com/file/5hvy9QS
http://www.fileserve.com/file/V69TVkT
http://www.fileserve.com/file/fXnZVYN
http://www.fileserve.com/file/H7Z4KPw
http://www.fileserve.com/file/SH3pGMx
http://www.fileserve.com/file/W8hSe5v
http://www.fileserve.com/file/C6DZ9gN
http://www.fileserve.com/file/SZmvWsE
http://www.fileserve.com/file/6Fg7txp
http://www.fileserve.com/file/Hb9sTKH
thanks dude
Looks really good.
Also, any torrents ?
what a waste, it’s Lightwave :(
Dude,
Do you even know ANYTHING about Lightwave? I have used it since Toaster (beta) days. I am ALSO using Maya XSI and Houdini for the past 7 years or so.
Each one of those apps have their strong points. ONLY a “fool” would bad-mouth an app to hide their ignorance of that product. An “intelligent” person would use various tools to achieve what they are after. You chose which of those camps that you want to be in.
Bottom line; If it is good for James Cameron to use on his Academy Award winning movies, It IS good for me!
Nuff said!
who uses lightwave these days?
I do, and any one out of the me-too bandwagon at least respects its power. Go try rendering such high-quality images out of your bloated and molasses-slow Mental Ray and IF you succeed come back here with your lame trash talk about what you don’t understand, Autodesk fanboy.
oh no….
it’s laightwave!
why you don’t say what program this tutorial is for huh?
haha i thought the same thing! i dont like lightwave
i think people must be more professional maya 3dsMax lightwave softimage C4d Houdini…. are tools to help you saving you ass when you are in production i am working right now on huge arch viz project(lots buildings trees etc…) on maya (im working on maya since maya 5 ), need to be rendered in full HD and impossible to render in mental ray cos of memory error i transfered the project on lightwave on the same machine and it rendred the same scene on full HD radiosity etc… in only 2 mn.
i am not saying that a software is better than others but every artist or studio uses the tool that fit their needs. you dont have to by a boeing 747 to carry 10 people… so
Torrent please!
Thanks for the up anyways ;-)
gee, thanks!
Please people don’t thing about lightwave as a not professional or high level software. Before to give a judgement about something is not known better to be informed.
LW was used in Cinema production since a lot and more than 3dsmax in the past years and today too. About modeling is and ever been impressive with its metanurbs and polymodeling tools. and about rendering quality is one of the better and in it grown plugins that are used now and olny now in other great softwares u mentioned (XSI,3dsmax, MAya etc) for example the fur plugins many of those kind grown to beat the sasquatch plug by worley (http://www.worley.com/) that was the top in absolute
to do a pratic example even this spot was done in Lightwave:
http://www.cg-blog.com/index.php/2007/07/09/citroen-c4-runner-the-embassy.htm
sorry my bad english
all people who thinks one software is better than the other are just a bunch of ****. first and foremost no matter what the video is designed for, the basic principles behind it are the same, they may change the names of the tools but they are always the same in its foundation. if someone can’t get past the barrier of ‘tools’, only means they don’t know the ‘idea’. pff
What about someone give away only the textures
anybody pls give me new link this tutorial
For those who regret on LightWave or Maya or Max or C4D, or whatever, let me tell you the software doesn?t make the good CG Art, is the artist who knows how to use the goods of the software who makes the CG Art…. First Learn this and then you can go on on your CGI Carrer
died all links.